06302004 - News Article - Panel issues recommendation

Also See:





Panel issues recommendation
Indiana Lawyer (Indianapolis, IN)
June 30, 2004
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.portagelibrary.info/resources/doc/nb/news/10E9B7055D89AD10?p=AWNB
A panel of three judges assigned to hear a case involving the judicial conduct of Lake Superior Judge Joan Kouros has submitted recommendations to the Indiana Supreme Court in the case.

The masters' panel, consisting of Marion Superior Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, Allen Superior Judge John Surbeck Jr., and Vanderburgh Circuit Judge Carl Heldt, conducted a hearing April 22 during which the high court's Judicial Qualifications Commission presented arguments on a 78-count complaint against the judge.

On June 14, the masters recommended that Kouros not be disbarred.

"The Masters do not find that Judge Kouros has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules of Professional Conduct to the extent that she should be disbarred," they wrote.

They also found that Judge Kouros' illnesses - multiple sclerosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression - do not affect her ability to perform her judicial duties, as long as she is receiving proper care.

However, they did find that Kouros violated judicial canons.

"While serious, the Masters find that Judge Kouros' conduct, for the most part, has not been 'willful' in the sense that she has intentionally neglected her duties or dismissed their importance," they said. "By all accounts, she is a good judge in all respects excepting gross inefficiencies and delays in performing her tasks."

Despite these findings, the masters made no recommendation as to her discipline, removal, or retirement.

The commission's counts accused the judge of failure to file important paperwork in a timely manner and of telling the Supreme Court in February 2001 that a transcription system had been installed in her court to prevent further delays, when in fact the system was not installed until February 2003.

The recommendation along with Kouros' answer to the recommendation will go to the Supreme Court, which will consider the case and issue an opinion. Depending on how long the briefing process takes, a final decision could be handed down in mid- to late summer.

06182004 - News Article - Judge Kouros saga gives new meaning to blind justice

Also See:





Judge Kouros saga gives new meaning to blind justice
Post-Tribune (IN)
June 18, 2004
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.portagelibrary.info/resources/doc/nb/news/103611A70F52A315?p=AWNB
It has been 3 1/2 years since the Indiana Supreme Court determined there was a substantial problem with Lake Superior Court Criminal Division Judge Joan Kouros' operation of her courtroom.

The Supreme Court's handling of the matter since January 2001 borders on criminal.

I suspect the high court has been too busy sticking it to Lake County on a number of crucial cases -- including Hospital Care for the Indigent -- to resolve the Kouros matter.

A glimpse at the Kouros saga makes it easy to understand why the general population regards the justice system with such low esteem.

Lake County Jail officials complained in late 2000 that too many people continued to sit in jail because Kouros had failed to file the release papers.

Although catching the Supreme Court's attention is about as trying as paper-training a puppy, the plea from the jail was heard.

The high court said it found a mess -- a massive case backlog.

The supremes told her to fix the problem, then disappeared for more than two years. Not only did things not get better, but they worsened over that period.

In May 2003, Kouros told the supremes that besides having multiple sclerosis, she also had an obsessive-compulsive disorder that became more pronounced because of the MS.

Can you imagine a defense attorney telling his client that although the judge has an obsessive-compulsive disorder, maybe we'll be lucky and catch her on a good day?

In June 2003 -- 30 months after the supremes told Kouros to clean up her court -- they determined things hadn't improved and suspended her.

While Kouros was off the bench, doing what was necessary to win back her job, the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission filed 78 disciplinary counts against Kouros in September 2003.

So what does the high court team of legal beagles do? You got it. They reinstated her in December 2003.

In March, just as the puppy was learning to piddle on the paper, the supremes decided they better start taking this Kouros matter seriously.

The court put its foot down and rejected a conditional agreement worked out between the Qualifications Commission and Kouros. That agreement would have allowed her to continue to make obsessive-compulsive decisions about people's lives on a daily basis.

Rather than remove her from the bench, the supremes named a three-member panel of judicial masters to hear the charges against Kouros.

There was a 10-hour hearing that resulted in a 48-page report that said, well, virtually nothing. There was no recommendation on Kouros' future.

Because the judicial masters are about as spineless as the Supreme Court, Kouros' fate now bounces back to the Qualifications Commission, which has 30 days to make a recommendation to the high court. Kind of makes you wonder why the court even brought the judicial masters into the ballgame. Buck-passing, perhaps.

After the Qualifications Commission makes a recommendation, then Kouros' lawyers have 30 days to make a response. Next thing you know, it will be Christmas and the supremes might finally decide what they found to be true in January 2001 is still true today -- Kouros shouldn't be a judge.

Wouldn't you just know this fiasco started in East Chicago? That's where Kouros' father, Gus, is a councilman and a lieutenant for political boss Tom Cappas, who convinced then-Gov. Evan Bayh to make Kouros a judge in 1997.

What a web politics can weave.

06162004 - News Article - Now serving: Waffles, side of indecision

Also See:





Now serving: Waffles, side of indecision
NWI Times
Jun 16, 2004
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/opinion/columnists/mark-kiesling/now-serving-waffles-side-of-indecision/article_d2cd4fa4-f37c-592c-a381-9352df8340a9.html
Three judicial jellyfish couldn't come to any conclusion about whether Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros should be removed from the bench, instead putting the question into the laps of the five Indiana Supreme Court justices.

The jellyfish, formally known as a panel of masters, heard testimony regarding Kouros' fitness on the bench and after months of pondering, issued a 48-page report made public Monday that makes no recommendation whatsoever.

The report recounts in agonizing detail Kouros' repeated failures on the bench, in which she cost prisoners time, cost attorneys money and failed to perform tasks demanded by the Indiana Supreme Court, then told the court she was in compliance with their orders.

Then, the report concludes by saying Kouros is a good judge who should be all right if she gets enough staff and uses her time properly.

This report was so waffly it should have been delivered by Mrs. Butterworth.

If Kouros had been a normal defendant facing probation revocation, her actions are so clearly in violation she would now be in the Department of Corrections.

But she's not. She's a judge. Who judges a judge? Other judges.

The masters showed so little backbone their robes must be acting as sort of an exoskeleton to keep them upright. Maybe they are profiles in judicial courage when dealing with Joe or Jane Doe, but when there's another judge in the dock, they took the coward's way out.

What they did is leave the decision entirely up to the Indiana Supreme Court, which will now have to decide whether to remove or retain Kouros based upon a report that says neither yea nor nay.

Kouros' defense lawyer, the magician Stan Jablonski, has pulled enough rabbits out of his hat on this case to start his own petting zoo. He sees the decision as a victory for his client in that it does not call for her ouster as many expected.

The most maddening thing is the lack of intestinal fortitude found in the report. If you think Kouros can't function, recommend removal. If she's doing a good job but just needs a little fine tuning, recommend retention.

But make a decision. No wonder Indiana legislators don't want to give judges raises if this is how they perform under pressure. It's a slap to all judges who daily make the tough, unpopular decisions the law sometimes requires.

People from downstate are often critical of the way things are done in Lake County, the nod-and-wink politics where pragmatism trumps propriety.

These masters had a chance to send a message that shenanigans, including basically lying to the Indiana Supreme Court, will not be tolerated whether you're wearing a bathrobe or a black robe.

Instead, they sent the message that if this is the way the folks of Lake County want their judges to behave, that's OK with them.

By doing so, the judicial jellyfish stung each citizen of Lake County.

06162004 - News Article - EDITORIALS - Yet another last chance - The issue: Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros - Our opinion: If she cannot do the job, she should not be on the bench

Also See:





EDITORIALS - Yet another last chance
The issue: Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros
Our opinion: If she cannot do the job, she should not be on the bench
NWI Times
Jun 16, 2004
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/opinion/editorial/yet-another-last-chance/article_00582ae0-a771-5f51-9100-d8f910c0d969.html
Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros got one more last chance to keep her job when a panel of state judges declined to recommend her removal from the bench.

Just how many more last chances will she be given? How many more should she be given?

The three judges from Evansville, Fort Wayne and Indianapolis, appointed by the state Supreme Court to examine her job performance, issued a damming opinion documenting her problems and her failure to correct them. They found that in at least 40 criminal cases, Kouros failed to return written summaries of her decisions to the court clerk's office within 48 hours, as required by the Supreme Court. In two cases, police could not act to arrest accused criminals because of her delay, according to the judges. They found a return to "substantial disorder" in her offices and on her bench in March.

They also cited the mitigating circumstances of her suffering from multiple sclerosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression. But her doctors said that with proper care and treatment, her health issues should not interfere with her ability to do her job.

By not making a recommendation, the three judges appear to have sidestepped their mandate, which was to decide whether to discipline her and how. They were told to recommend her removal from the bench.

Kouros was given warnings and detailed instructions two years ago on how to manage her paperwork. When she failed to comply, the high court suspended her for six months last year.

Kouros is not home free yet, however. The Judicial Qualifications Commission, which prosecutes judicial misconduct, soon could recommend her suspension until the Supreme Court issues a final verdict on her judicial career.

If she cannot do the job, she should not be on the bench. She should be the first to admit that. She also should not be ashamed of getting treatment for her health problems.

In the end, the justices of the Indiana Supreme Court will have the final say. Their decision should be based on maintaining public confidence in the judiciary and keeping the court running smoothly.

06162004 - News Article - Panel takes no action on Lake County judge

Also See:





Panel takes no action on Lake County judge
The Journal Gazette (Fort Wayne, IN)
June 16, 2004
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.portagelibrary.info/resources/doc/nb/news/1038E73B15211EFF?p=AWNB
A panel appointed by the Indiana Supreme Court made no recommendation on whether a Lake County judge suspended for six months last year for not reducing a backlog of cases should be removed from office.

The three-judge panel found in its Monday ruling that Lake Superior Court Judge Joan Kouros violated canons of the court, has committed conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, but her conduct "for the most part, has not been `willful.' "

"By all accounts, she is a good judge in all respects excepting gross inefficiencies and delays in performing her tasks," the report said.

The review began in 2000 when an attorney complained that several inmates were languishing in jail because of unprocessesed paperwork.

The Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission has 30 days to decide whether to again recommend Kouros be removed. If it does so, she would be suspended with pay, said Meg Babcock, counsel for the commission.

Kouros would then have 30 days to respond.

The state Supreme Court would then have to decide on whether to remove Kouros from the bench.

Her attorney, Kevin McGoff, said he was heartened by the "no decision," though he said the report gave him no particular insight to where the high court could be headed.

"In the end, it will be up to the Supreme Court to decide," he said.

Kouros said during a hearing in April before the panel that after she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1984, an obsessive compulsive disorder became more pronounced, hampering her work.

06152004 - News Article - Kouros to keep spot on bench, for now - State says judge is still untidy, but won't recommend discharging her

Also See:






Kouros to keep spot on bench, for now
State says judge is still untidy, but won't recommend discharging her
NWI Times
Jun 15, 2004
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/kouros-to-keep-spot-on-bench-for-now/article_61b9ea3f-7554-5566-ac74-7b78c1e1fc8c.html
CROWN POINT -- A panel of state judges declined Monday to recommend the removal of Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros, despite new evidence of administrative disarray in her court.

"We look at this as encouraging," said Kouros' lawyer, Stanley Jablonski of Merrillville, after the 48-page opinion was released.

Nevertheless, the Indiana Supreme Court could suspend her for a second time and ultimately remove her from the bench later this year for repeatedly failing to get her work done in a timely manner. The report also indicated the possibility that Kouros has been offered the opportunity to retire as judge.

With the criminal court closed Monday because of a power outage, Kouros wasn't available for comment on the critical review of her judicial career by three judges from Evansville, Fort Wayne and Indianapolis.

The Supreme Court appointed the three, called masters, to examine her job performance. Most of the opinion recounts her problems and failure to correct them.

The masters conclude Kouros falsely certified to the Supreme Court she would comply with rules of good administrative practices and thus "committed willful misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice ... and undermined public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary."

They said, in mitigation, she sufferers from multiple sclerosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression, although her doctors said none of her health issues -- with proper care and treatment -- should interfere with her ability to do the job.

They said she hasn't "intentionally neglected her duties or dismissed their importance. By all accounts she is a good judge in all respects excepting gross inefficiencies and delays in performing her tasks."

Jablonski said, "We are very pleased the masters found that Judge Kouros, with the proper use of personnel and her time, will be able to meet the standards set by the canons of the Indiana Supreme Court."

Meg Babcock, counsel for the Judicial Qualifications Commission, which prosecutes judicial misconduct, declined comment Monday, but said the commission soon could recommend Kouros' suspension until the Supreme Court renders a final verdict on her judicial career.

Kouros was appointed judge in 1997. Lawyers practicing in her court began complaining four years ago she was slow in completing routine paperwork.

The Supreme Court first asked Kouros' fellow judges to help her improve. They said she initially refused their assistance.

The Judicial Qualifications Commission reviewed her court and found a backlog of hundreds of cases awaiting her signature on decisions made months earlier. Her tardiness aggravated overcrowding in the county lockup by preventing inmates from being transferred to a state prison.

The high court issued warnings and detailed instructions two years ago on how to manage her paperwork. She failed to comply, and the high court suspended her for six months last year. Raymond Kickbush, a retired judge from Porter County, said he had to labor excessively to return her court to normalcy.

Kouros admitted last fall her obsessive-compulsive disorder prevents her from performing routine jobs without excessive deliberation. The high court reinstated her in January, but the evidence indicates Kouros has fallen into the old pattern.

"Photographs of Judge Kouros' bench and offices in March 29, 2004, reflect her return to substantial disorder," the masters wrote.

They found Kouros failed in at least 40 criminal cases between January and March to return written summaries of her decisions to the court clerk's office within 48 hours as required by the Supreme Court. In some cases, she delayed two months or more.

She sentenced one man to prison but he remained in the county jail for more than a month. He complained he was denied prison incentives, including credit toward early release. In two cases, police couldn't act to arrest accused criminals because of her delay, the masters found.

06152004 - News Article - Kouros stays on pending decision - Judicial panel fails to recommend any action on courtroom rule violations

Also See:





Kouros stays on pending decision
Judicial panel fails to recommend any action on courtroom rule violations
Post-Tribune (IN)
June 15, 2004
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.portagelibrary.info/resources/doc/nb/news/1034D873915479B7?p=AWNB
For the time being, Lake Superior Judge Joan Kouros will remain on the bench, after a judicial panel failed to recommend a course of action to the Indiana Supreme Court.

The 48-page report, dated June 10 but filed with the court Monday, makes no recommendation on whether Kouros should be removed or forcibly retired for violating a January 2003 Supreme Court order, designed to end the chronic backlog in her court.

Kouros is still hearing cases, but she could be suspended with pay, even with the Supreme Court ruling pending, if the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission takes the position that she should be removed. The commission, which acts as prosecutor in cases of misconduct by judges and attorneys, has 30 days to file its position with the high court, said Meg Babcock, the attorney handling the Kouros case for the commission.

"The report itself doesn't affect her status," she said.

After the commission files, Kouros will have another 30 days to file her response with the court, before the Supreme Court finishes deliberating on its ruling.

Her case stems back to 2001, when the Lake County Jail officials wrote the Lake County judges that people remained in lockup, seemingly without cause. The cases were traced back to Kouros' court, which had delayed filing the paperwork that would have allowed the inmates to be released.

The Supreme Court suspended Kouros last June and re-instated her in December. In March, the high court rejected a conditional agreement worked out between Kouros and the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commissions, which would have allowed her to remain on the bench.

Instead, the high court ordered a three-member panel of judicial masters to hear the evidence against her and report back to the court. During the 10-hour hearing in April, the senior judge who replaced her, retired Porter County Superior Court Judge Raymond Kickbush, testified that the job appeared too big for Kouros. His comments are part of the 48-page report.

While acting as judge in Kouros' court, Kickbush found a letter from accused serial killer Eugene Britt in a box of old magazines and other artifacts found under the office fax machine. In the letter, Britt asked Kouros to stop his lawyers from using the insanity defense. Kouros had declared Britt unfit to stand trial and a copy of the letter was not in Britt's case file.

Case logs showed Kouros continued to keep files from the Lake County Clerk's Office checked out to her courtroom, days and even weeks beyond the 48-hour limit set by the Supreme Court.

In her defense, Kouros, a Schererville resident, said she suffers from multiple sclerosis. She said once MS was diagnosed in 1984, an obsessive-compulsive disorder became more pronounced.

While suspended from the bench, she began seeing a psychiatrist and a psychologist. And, she told the panel in April, she had been taking medication to control her obsessive compulsions.

She declared she had hired a new staff and the backlog was diminishing.

Her attorney, Kevin McGoff of Indianapolis said he was heartened by the "no decision," though he said the report gave him no particular insight to where the high court could be headed in the case.

"In the end, it will be up to the Supreme Court to decide," he said.

Kouros, who turns 46 on Thursday, has been Lake Superior Court judge since 1997.

Disciplinary cases involving judges rarely come to a hearing. The Judicial Qualification Commission averages less than one every two years, Babcock said.

In March, the Supreme Court had acted with unusual swiftness in rejecting the agreement worked out between the commission and Kouros, tossing out the proposal a day after it was filed.

While not deciding on her fate as a judge, the panel of three senior judges did recommend that Kouros retain her law license. It also ruled that multiple sclerosis did not appear to be a factor whether she could run a court.

"With more efficient use of her personnel and her time, Judge Kouros may be able to meet the standards set by the (judicial) cannons and the Supreme Court. However, at the time of the hearing of this matter, she had not done so," the panel wrote in the report.

Reporter Steve Walsh can be reached at 648-3120 or by e-mail at swalsh@post-trib.com.

Gov. Evan Bayh appointed Joan Kouros as Lake Superior Court judge in January 1997, in one of his last acts as Indiana governor. Kouros replaced retiring Judge Richard Conroy.

She graduated from the Valparaiso School of Law in 1983 and then she began working as a county deputy prosecutor. She rose to the rank of trial supervisor before becoming an assistant U.S. Attorney in Hammond in 1990.

In 1993, Kouros went into private practice and worked as a Superior Court, County Division, public defender, until her appointment to the bench.

06122004 - News Article - Decision on judge's ouster is delayed

Also See:





Decision on judge's ouster is delayed
NWI Times
Jun 12, 2004
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/state-and-regional/decision-on-judge-s-ouster-is-delayed/article_22b60e64-168e-57c8-a396-6e072fd72539.html
INDIANAPOLIS -- A decision on the fate of Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros may not come until next week.

A three-judge panel that heard evidence in April that she mismanaged her court was expected to deliver its opinion Friday on whether she should be removed from the bench or otherwise disciplined.

The document did not arrive in the mail at the Indiana Supreme Court before the close of business, said David Remondini, a spokesman for the high court. It is expected early next week.

Kouros was appointed to the office in 1997. Lawyers practicing in her court began complaining in 2000 that she was unable to complete paperwork in a timely fashion.

The Supreme Court staff found a backlog of hundreds of cases awaiting her signature on decisions made months earlier. Her tardiness aggravated overcrowding in the county lockup by preventing inmates from being transferred to a state prison in 2001.

Kouros admitted last fall she has been diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which prevents her from performing routine jobs without excessive deliberation and complex rituals.

Raymond Kickbush, a retired judge from Porter County who filled in for Kouros during a six-month period in which she was suspended from duty last year, testified in April he thought the job was too demanding for Kouros.

06122004 - News Article - Deadline passes, no word on judge's fate - Postal holiday may have delayed panel's decision on Judge Joan Kouros' job

Also See:





Deadline passes, no word on judge's fate 
Postal holiday may have delayed panel's decision on Judge Joan Kouros' job
Post-Tribune (IN)
June 12, 2004
http://infoweb.newsbank.com.proxy.portagelibrary.info/resources/doc/nb/news/10342A05329D669E?p=AWNB
A panel of judges may have decided whether Lake Superior Court Judge Joan Kouros can keep her job, but their decision isn't public yet.

Friday was the deadline set by the Indiana Supreme Court for the judges' decision.

But post offices were closed Friday for a national day of mourning to mark former President Reagan's funeral, and that could have delayed delivery of the decision.

The Supreme Court appointed three judges last November to decide whether Kouros, a judge since 1997, could stay on the bench.

They are Carl Heldt, Vanderburgh Circuit Court; Tanya Walton Pratt, Marion Superior Court; and John Surbeck Jr., Allen Superior Court.

The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications charged Kouros last September with failing to process important paperwork in time.

Kouros has said she suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder and multiple sclerosis but is undergoing treatment.

06112004 - News Article - Kouros case may start dominoes

Also See:





Kouros case may start dominoes
NWI Times
Jun 11, 2004
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/opinion/columnists/mark-kiesling/kouros-case-may-start-dominoes/article_49a35587-c610-56a8-b709-70e8fbba7c8f.html
Lake Criminal Court Judge Joan Kouros will find out today if she's in line to become the Big Domino.

The panel of masters that heard testimony in April on whether Kouros is competent to run her court is expected to issue its recommendation today for consideration by the Indiana Supreme Court.

Former Porter Circuit Court Judge Raymond Kickbush, who filled in for Kouros after she was suspended from the bench for six months last year, testified before the panel the job was "too big" for Kouros, who suffers from mental and physical disabilities.

Kouros argued that with proper treatment she can function as well as anyone and maybe better.

She is in denial about the problems caused by her afflictions, and no matter how much we may sympathize with her, the state high court is going to have to decide this case on the welfare of Indiana citizens and not that of one individual.

Markers allegedly have been called in on Kouros' behalf, including U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh, the former governor who named her a judge following intense lobbying by the East Chicago political group that includes Kouros' father, Councilman Gus Kouros.

Bayh, under pressure from blacks to name a black judge, tabbed Kouros on the last day of his governorship, then headed for the border before local black leaders realized they'd been had.

Even Bayh may not be able to save the Kouros judgeship, and she may fall, which will be the beginning of an interesting domino effect inside Lake County politics.

Someone would have to be named to fill any vacancy on the criminal court. The scenario is that Lake Superior Court Judge Julie Cantrell would move up from the county division to the criminal division, where she has years of experience as a deputy prosecutor.

Then, the scenario continues, Lake County Clerk Tom Philpot, who passed the bar last year and who has worked as a public defender in the county courts, would ascend to Cantrell's bench.

"Who knows?" Philpot said. "I'd like to be a lot of things."

Inside politicians say chief among those things is judge, and Democratic Party Chairman Stephen Stiglich is supporting the bid.

One of the things that gives the speculation some credibility is the continuation of the influence of East Chicago.

There is no doubt that East Chicago played some role in getting the criminal court judgeships for three of the four sitting judges. Philpot and Cantrell both have their roots in East Chicago.

Stiglich, who is from East Chicago, would have great influence on who would replace Philpot as clerk, perhaps election board Director Sally LaSota, whom he appointed to that position.

She could then be replaced by Stiglich with Al Pena, an East Chicago native whom he appointed to the election board in March amid much hoo-hah about Pena's being the board's first Hispanic member.

The whole scenario is certainly premature, but makes for great speculation.

08132023 - News Article - Former Portage Mayor James Snyder asks US Supreme Court to consider his case

  Former Portage Mayor James Snyder asks US Supreme Court to consider his case Chicago Tribune  Aug 13, 2023 https://www.chicagotribune.com/...