04302018 - News Article - Snyder continues to push for information on feds' email review



Snyder continues to push for information on feds' email review
Chicago Tribune
April 30, 2018
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-snyder-trial-discovery-push-st-0501-story.html

Having already questioned federal investigators’ access to Portage Mayor James Snyder’s email, his defense team is continuing its push to find out how those emails were screened.

Defense attorney Jackie Bennett Jr. and federal prosecutors have exchanged a series of court filings as Snyder’s team tries to force the release of documentation of how investigators were told to screen the mayor’s email communication, according to documents filed Monday.

Bennett said asked to court to compel federal investigators to release “documentary materials regarding its privilege filter” showing how Snyder’s seized email communications were screened, but Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Koster said, in court filings, what the defense is seeking “are not things which can be inspected or copied like books or documents.”

Snyder argued that the government has not produced any evidence that it maintained a privilege filter during its investigation into the case, according to court filings, and prosecutors now say that information is not subject to discovery as it is work product.

“When Snyder now seeks confirmation that the government did not have a mechanism to recognize and quarantine from the trial team such work product, the government responds that information regarding its purported privilege filter is protected as its own work product,” Bennett wrote in court documents. “Apart from its self-serving rhetorical tautology, however, this argument should be denied for its sheer chutzpah.”

Koster said “the defendant’s interrogatories seek answers, not things” but then recast its request for material the defense would not have access to.

“What takes chutzpah is misrepresenting the holding of a Supreme Court case to support one’s request for discovery which is specifically prohibited by a black-letter rule of federal criminal procedure,” Koster wrote.

The documentation on the “taint team” procedures sought by Snyder’s attorneys follows accusations that the trial team had access to privileged emails between the mayor and his defense attorneys, according to court documents, and warrants a judge to require new prosecutors handle the case and could rise to the dismissal of several charges.

The allegations against the prosecutors say email communications between Snyder, defense attorney Thomas Dogan, and Thomas Kirsch II, who was then the mayor’s defense attorney before being appointed as U.S. attorney, were seized in 2015, according to court documents.

Kirsch has recused himself from Snyder’s case, according to court documents, and U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois would oversee and manage local prosecutors handling the case.

Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen has set a May 10 hearing to review the motion to disqualify the trial team and potentially dismiss some of the charges against Snyder.

Snyder and John Cortina, of Kustom Auto Body in Portage, were charged in November 2016 with allegedly violating a federal bribery statue. Federal prosecutors said the mayor allegedly solicited money from Cortina and “Individual A” and gave them a towing contract for Portage.

Snyder received an additional bribery indictment for alleged accepting $13,000 in connection with a Board of Works contract, and allegedly obstructing Internal Revenue Service laws.

Snyder and Cortina both pleaded not guilty to the charges, according to court documents.

04302018 - News Article - Prosecutors, defense continue to argue over documents and information in Portage mayor's corruption case



Prosecutors, defense continue to argue over documents and information in Portage mayor's corruption case
NWI Times
April 30, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/prosecutors-defense-continue-to-argue-over-documents-and-information-in/article_0e4a2b3f-3f6e-5874-809b-ca3d08f98ec3.html

HAMMOND — Prosecutors and defense in Portage Mayor James Snyder's public corruption case continue to battle over the release of information by federal investigators.

At issue is Snyder's motion to compel federal prosecutors to turn over additional discovery regarding the procedures used to cull through hundreds of emails to determine which, if any, qualified for attorney-client privilege.

Snyder's defense team filed an initial motion to compel on March 20. A second motion to compel was filed April 16.

While Snyder's team contends the information requested is necessary to defend their position that federal investigators and prosecutors saw and used emails that should have been considered attorney/client privilege, the U.S. attorney's office is claiming that Snyder is not entitled to that information for a variety of reasons.

During a phone conference on April 23, both sides agreed that sufficient information had been presented to the court via the filing of multiple briefs by both sides to make a decision and that a hearing on Snyder's motions to compel was not necessary for the judge to rule.

However, the U.S. attorney's office filed another reply in opposition to Snyder's arguments on Friday. That reply continues to contend that the prosecution does not have to turn over the requested information or documents because they aren't relevant to Snyder's case.

Snyder's attorney, Jackie M. Bennett Jr., of Indianapolis, on Monday filed yet another argument on the issue, saying prosecutors are wrong on the issue and that filing yet another brief after an agreement had been made not to hold a hearing is not an "appropriate procedural tactic."

No date has been set as to when U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Van Bokklen may rule on the issue. Snyder has asked that the prosecution turn over the information by Thursday in anticipation of a May 10 hearing in the case. The May 10 hearing will hear evidence as to whether Snyder's Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial were violated by prosecutors, who Snyder contends unfairly reviewed privileged communications between himself and his former attorney Thomas Kirsch II, now U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Indiana. Kirsch has recused himself from the case, which now is being managed by the U.S. attorney's office in Chicago.

Snyder has asked that his indictment be dismissed or that the current prosecuting team be disqualified.

Snyder was indicted in November 2016 on counts of bribery and tax evasion. His trial has been set for June 4.

04262018 - News Article - Hearing set on Portage mayor's claims his rights were violated during federal corruption probe



Hearing set on Portage mayor's claims his rights were violated during federal corruption probe
NWI Times
April 26, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/hearing-set-on-portage-mayor-s-claims-his-rights-were/article_95ace816-1f6b-53c6-a753-1aadadf4a276.html

HAMMOND — A hearing to determine whether indicted Portage Mayor James Snyder's rights have been violated will be held May 10.

U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen set the in-person hearing for 10:30 a.m. in his courtroom.

In a motion filed by Snyder's defense team on Feb. 28, they claimed that federal investigators and prosecutors unfairly reviewed emails that should be considered attorney/client privilege. 

The motion claims those emails contained several confidential communications between Snyder and his former defense attorney Thomas Kirsch II, now U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Indiana. Kirsch has recused himself from the case, which now is being managed by the U.S. attorney's office in Chicago.

A practice known as a "taint team," made up of prosecutors and law enforcement agents, was put in place to screen the communications to protect Snyder's rights and determine which of the documents should not be viewed by the prosecution.

Snyder contends the process failed and the failure to keep the alleged attorney/client privilege emails out of view of investigators and prosecutors violated his Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial.

Van Bokkelen held a hearing on the issue March 15. The judge said he didn't see a "smoking gun" in the emails the defense is complaining about, but he is too unfamiliar with the 4-year-old investigation to determine what information is and isn't important. He directed both sides to file additional briefs to prove their case.

The filing of those briefs led to additional claims by Snyder's defense attorney, Jackie M. Bennett, of Indianapolis, that prosecutors had not been forthcoming in providing information on the email review process. Bennett filed a motion requesting the courts to compel the prosecution to provide that information. The court has not yet ruled on that motion.

Snyder was indicted in November 2016 on counts of bribery and tax evasion. His trial has been set for June 4.

04232018 - News Article - Portage mayor accuses government of lying, hiding facts in latest filing in his corruption case



Portage mayor accuses government of lying, hiding facts in latest filing in his corruption case
NWI Times
April 23, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/portage-mayor-accuses-government-of-lying-hiding-facts-in-latest/article_ab74fe96-f0bb-5d33-b589-acb8af5e16ea.html
HAMMOND — Portage Mayor James Snyder's defense team is accusing the U.S. attorney's office of lying and keeping secret information necessary for his defense.

In a filing in Snyder's public corruption case on Sunday in U.S. District Court in Hammond, Snyder's lead attorney, Jackie M. Bennett of Indianapolis, argues federal prosecutors have "repeatedly misrepresented material facts" regarding the issue of whether prosecutors have viewed attorney/client privileged emails and whether viewing those emails have prejudiced Snyder.

The issue over Snyder's email and his contentions that his rights have been violated will be decided without a hearing. According to court documents filed Monday, "all parties" agreed during a teleconference Monday that no hearing will be necessary to decide the motion regarding the email.

The response filed Sunday defends Snyder's second motion to compel discovery last week, which contends prosecutors have not provided requested information regarding the email review process.

Bennett contends the process to filter the emails failed and, not only have prosecutors viewed confidential emails, but also have changed their stories several times regarding that process and whether the emails have been viewed.

Snyder claims both his Sixth and Fourth Amendment rights have been violated and seeks either the indictment against him be dismissed or the current prosecution team be disqualified.

"Snyder's attempt to understand the government's privilege filter has been hampered not only by the government's reticence regarding what procedures it had in place to protect Snyder's constitutional rights, but also the government's ever-changing description of the filter process," according to the latest filing.

"These changing representations bear directly upon fundamental matters of whether some agents have viewed or been exposed to every email," the filing continues, adding "the government's story never improves; instead, in each case the emended representation shows or suggests that the problems previously identified by Snyder are worse than originally known."

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, along with tax evasion charges related to his private business. 

04202018 - News Article - Portage mayor, City Council reach agreement over fate of Utility Service Board after protracted dispute that included a lawsuit



Portage mayor, City Council reach agreement over fate of Utility Service Board after protracted dispute that included a lawsuit
NWI Times
April 20, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/portage-mayor-city-council-reach-agreement-over-fate-of-utility/article_f36bee0b-9773-5599-8870-87b76ee62dda.html

PORTAGE — The City Council and Mayor James Snyder have reached an agreement on how to end their dispute over the legality of the Utility Service Board.

The stipulated agreement was approved by the City Council late Friday afternoon and will be entered into the courts, canceling a hearing scheduled for Monday morning.

Snyder brought a lawsuit against the City Council about two months ago, claiming they were acting in opposition to state law and the USB was improperly formed.

The City Council, which took over the USB just over a year ago, claiming Snyder was inappropriately using funds from the utility department to lease cars and attempted to spend $93,000 of the department's money to pay his personal legal fees, believed the board was acting properly.

In essence, the agreement calls for the council to create separate stormwater and sanitary sewer boards, which operated in the city prior to 2010 when the two boards were combined into one Utility Service Board.

The council will likely create those boards at its May 1 meeting, said City Council Attorney Ken Elwood, adding the board will not have any authority until the process is completed to dismantle the USB.

"They will begin the process to discuss how to unwind the USB and go back to the two boards," Elwood said, adding it must be done in a "reasonable" amount of time.

Once the negotiations on how to dismantle the USB are completed, Elwood said, the council will vote on the final package and transfer authority to the re-created Sanitary Board and Storm Water Management Board.

The agreement also states that the USB will not take any actions outside the day-to-day operation, current stormwater fees will be collected and increased revenue from those fees will be impounded until the USB is dissolved.

Elwood said if negotiations break down and an agreement cannot be reached in that reasonable time, the matter will return to the courts.

The agreement, Elwood said, does not say who is right or who is wrong.

"We still believe our position is correct," Elwood said.

"It is what we have been trying to do since Dec. 5," said Snyder, contacted after the meeting. "The agreed order gets the City Council to follow the law. It is good for Portage."

"I think this is in the best interest of all the parties," said City Council President Mark Oprisko, adding a continued legal battle would be costly with taxpayers paying for both sides. "I think the people who are going to benefit are the taxpayers of Portage."

04202018 - News Article - Hearings will be held on two matters in Snyder corruption case



Hearings will be held on two matters in Snyder corruption case
NWI Times
April 20, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/hearings-will-be-held-on-two-matters-in-snyder-corruption/article_375491fc-11ed-5ac1-8ac7-ef401e16fff3.html

HAMMOND — Hearings will be held in two matters pertaining to Portage Mayor James Snyder's public corruption case.

The date of the hearings will be set during a teleconference with all parties on Tuesday, according to U.S. District Court documents.

The court has agreed to hold a hearing on the potential conflict of interest issue regarding Kevin Milner, the attorney representing Snyder's co-defendant on one of the charges, John Cortina of Portage. Milner asked for the hearing as he also represented other potential witnesses in the Snyder case.

A hearing will also be held on Snyder's motion to compel federal prosecutors to turn over information requested in an April 12 letter. Snyder's defense has requested information on the "taint team" procedure used to cull through hundreds of emails to declare whether or not the emails are attorney/client privilege.

Snyder has requested the charges be dropped or the prosecution team be dismissed because he contends prosecutors viewed privileged emails and violated his Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial.

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, along with tax evasion charges related to his private business. Cortina was indicted for allegedly paying Snyder $12,000 to be put on the city's tow list.

The trial is set for June 4.

04192018 - News Article - Battle over Portage mayor's emails continues in federal court filings



Battle over Portage mayor's emails continues in federal court filings
NWI Times
April 19, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/battle-over-portage-mayor-s-emails-continues-in-federal-court/article_755ce058-ec8b-5d70-85b7-c0f743c103ac.html

HAMMOND — Federal prosecutors in the public corruption case of Portage Mayor James Snyder say information Snyder is seeking is "not relevant" for a judge to determine if a group of emails are attorney/client privilege.

In the third filing in the case this week, federal prosecutors answered a motion filed Monday by Snyder's defense team. 

Snyder's motion asks the U.S. District Court to compel prosecutors to turn over information requested from the assistant district attorney in an April 12 letter regarding the government's review process of Snyder's emails.

"The information Defendant seeks is not relevant to any defense or other admissible issue at trial, however. As already explained, it also is not relevant or essential to the Court’s determination of his pending motion. To the extent Defendant seeks the information because he believes it will help him challenge the propriety of the email search warrants, the government has addressed that argument, too. Simply put, Defendant has failed to establish that he is entitled to the information he seeks and, accordingly, Defendant’s motion to compel should be denied," reads the response to Snyder's motion.

Snyder has asked the indictments be dropped or the prosecution team be dismissed because of the alleged violation involving the emails.

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, along with tax evasion charges related to his private business. His trial is set for June 4.

04182018 - News Article - Prosecutor: Mayor corruption charges shouldn't be dismissed



Prosecutor: Mayor corruption charges shouldn't be dismissed
Chicago Daily Herald
April 18, 2018
http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20180418/news/304189906/
PORTAGE, Ind. -- An indicted northwest Indiana mayor hasn't proved that the handling of case-related emails warrant dismissing his corruption charges, according to a federal prosecutor.

Portage Mayor James Snyder recently filed a motion to have bribery and tax evasion charges dismissed because trial attorneys saw emails he said were protected by attorney-client privilege and contained information about work product and legal strategy. Snyder also previously asked for the prosecution team's dismissal.

Snyder and his attorney haven't illustrated how the email situation infringes on Snyder's constitutional right to a fair trial, said Jill Koster, assistant U.S. attorney. She said there's no evidence the emails were privileged and the defense hasn't shown any resulting prejudice.

"Even if defendant were able to meet his burden, he cites no support for the proposition that indictments ought to be dismissed or prosecution teams disqualified when attorney work-product is revealed," Koster said.

Snyder's lawyer, Jackie M. Bennett Jr., filed a motion Monday asking the U.S. District Court to compel prosecutors to turn over information about the government's review process of the emails.

The government filed a response that same day alleging the defense is starting a "fishing expedition" with such information inquiries.

Snyder was indicted in November 2016. He pleaded not guilty last year to bribery related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, and tax evasion charges related to Snyder's private business. His trial is scheduled for June 4.

Snyder is a Republican who was elected to his second term as Portage mayor in 2015.

The Democratic former sheriff of neighboring Lake County, John Buncich, was sentenced in January to more than 15 years in prison for a related case of accepting tens of thousands of dollars in bribes from towing businesses.

04182018 - News Article - Prosecutor opposes Portage mayor's bid to dismiss charges



Prosecutor opposes Portage mayor's bid to dismiss charges
Indiana Lawyer
April 18, 2018
https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/46750-prosecutor-opposes-portage-mayors-bid-to-dismiss-charges
A federal prosecutor says an indicted northwest Indiana mayor hasn’t proven his corruption charges should be dismissed because of how case-related emails were handled.

Portage Mayor James Snyder recently filed a motion to have bribery and tax evasion charges dismissed because trial attorneys saw emails he says were protected by attorney-client privilege. Snyder had also previously asked that the prosecution team be dismissed.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Koster said Snyder and his attorney haven’t illustrated how the email situation infringes on Snyder’s constitutional rights. She said there’s no evidence the emails were privileged, and the defense hasn’t shown any resulting prejudice.

Snyder’s lawyer filed a motion Monday asking the U.S. District Court to compel prosecutors to turn over information about the government’s review of the emails.

04172018 - News Article - Indicted Portage mayor responds in latest volley of briefs in federal court



Indicted Portage mayor responds in latest volley of briefs in federal court
NWI Times
April 17, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/indicted-portage-mayor-responds-in-latest-volley-of-briefs-in/article_bf873d1c-f9d6-5a94-82d9-cdfe20b34277.html

HAMMOND — Attorneys for indicted Portage Mayor James Snyder say despite the federal government issuing 120 subpoenas, having investigated every aspect of his life and "aggressive employment" of wired surveillance, they still aren't answering questions crucial to his defense.

Late Monday, Jackie M. Bennett Jr., of Indianapolis, filed yet another motion in the public corruption case.

The motion asks the U.S. District Court here to compel prosecutors to turn over information Bennett requested from the assistant district attorney in an April 12 letter regarding the government's review process of Snyder's emails.

Snyder's response is the latest filing in the battle between Snyder's defense team and the U.S. attorney's office over whether two to three dozen emails seized by the government during the investigation are covered by attorney/client privilege. Snyder has claimed the emails they consider deal with work product and/or legal strategy slipped through the prosecution's review process and were unfairly seen by investigators and prosecutors, violating Snyder's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, along with tax evasion charges related to his private business. His trial is set for June 4.

Snyder has asked the indictments be dropped because of the alleged violation or that the present prosecuting team be dismissed.

Government prosecutors have countered Snyder's claims, saying the emails in question are not attorney/client privileged and, even if they were, they do not unfairly prejudice his case.

In the government's latest filing, also on Monday, prosecutors also accused the defense of a going on a "fishing expedition" in regards to the inquiries.

"The government is wrong; the information sought is directly related to a topic the Court has instructed the parties to brief, and Snyder cannot fairly be expected to brief or explain that issue while the government keeps it conduct in secret," according to the brief filed by Bennett.

The motion goes on to outline the history of the requests and of the battle over the email issue. It requests the court to order prosecutors to answer Snyder's questions by Wednesday.

04172018 - News Article - Prosecutors: 'No support' to dismiss Portage mayor's corruption charges



Prosecutors: 'No support' to dismiss Portage mayor's corruption charges
April 17, 2018
Post-Tribune
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-snyder-motion-dismiss-response-st-0418-story.html

A federal prosecutor is arguing that indicted Portage Mayor James Snyder has not proved that the handling of emails warrants the dismissal of the corruption charges he faces or the disqualification of the trial team.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Koster on Monday said Snyder and his defense attorney, Jackie Bennett Jr., have failed to show how emails they say were subject to attorney-client privilege but seen by trial attorneys is grounds to dismiss the charges against the Portage mayor for infringing on his constitutional rights.

“… Even if defendant were able to meet his burden, he cites no support for the proposition that indictments ought to be dismissed or prosecution teams disqualified when attorney work-product is revealed,” Koster said in her response.

Koster said there’s been no evidence that the emails in question were privileged, according to court documents, and that the defense has not shown any prejudice as a result of those communications being viewed by the trial team.

The allegations against the prosecutors say email communications between Snyder, defense attorney Thomas Dogan, and Thomas Kirsch II, who was then the mayor’s defense attorney before being appointed as U.S. attorney, were seized in 2015, according to court documents.

Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen has not ruled on the email issue, and during a march hearing said it did not appear any of the communications looked like a “smoking gun.”

Kirsch has recused himself from Snyder’s case, according to court documents, and U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois would oversee and manage local prosecutors handling the case.

Snyder and John Cortina, of Kustom Auto Body in Portage, were charged in November 2016 with allegedly violating a federal bribery statue. Federal prosecutors said the mayor allegedly solicited money from Cortina and “Individual A” and gave them a towing contract for Portage.

Snyder received an additional bribery indictment for alleged accepting $13,000 in connection with a Board of Works Contract, and allegedly obstructing internal revenue laws.

Snyder and Cortina both pleaded not guilty to the charges, according to court documents.

During the discovery process for Snyder’s trial, Bennett said it was found that documents reviewed by the prosecutors contained confidential attorney-client material, according to court documents. Bennett said federal investigators used a “taint team” to review the email communication seized, according to court documents, but that review failed to shield all privileged communications from the trial team.

Bennett said when the defense received the emails quarantined by federal investigators for being privileged, several of those were also found in possession of the trial team.

“It is now beyond dispute, the government’s trial team has admitted it viewed communications that the taint team had previously deemed confidential,” Bennett wrote. “Worse, the subject matter of those privileged communication relates directly to core allegations charged in the indictment.”

Koster said it appears that versions of those documents were marked as both privileged and non-privileged, according to the motion, but those discrepancies do not change the fact those communications should not be shielded.

“…Any such errors by the government do not rise to the level of a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights and certainly not a violation that warrants dismissal of the indictment, especially where defendant still has not explained how he has been prejudiced by the government’s actions,” Koster wrote.

04162018 - News Article - Prosecution in Snyder corruption case pushes for answers on emails



Prosecution in Snyder corruption case pushes for answers on emails
NWI Times
April 16, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/prosecution-in-snyder-corruption-case-pushes-for-answers-on-emails/article_2e895cc5-c533-5035-bcc0-6519ddeb026d.html

HAMMOND — The prosecutors in Portage Mayor James Snyder's federal corruption case say in their latest filing that the court has sufficient information to make a decision to move the case forward.

In the filing Monday in U.S. District Court, they also accuse Snyder of a "fishing expedition" serving no relevant purpose in demanding the government answer numerous questions regarding the email review process.

The government response is the latest filing in the battle between Snyder's defense team and the U.S. attorney's office over whether two to three dozen emails seized by the government during the investigation are covered by attorney/client privilege. Snyder's attorney, Indianapolis-based Jackie M. Bennett, has claimed the emails they consider deal with work product and/or legal strategy slipped through the prosecution's review process and were unfairly seen by investigators and prosecutors, violating Snyder's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, along with tax evasion charges related to his private business. His trial is set for June 4.

Snyder has asked the indictments be dropped because of the alleged violation or that the present prosecuting team be dismissed.

"Critically, defendant's new claims do not change the two questions this court need answer to resolve the defendant's motion," reads the latest filing, adding those questions are whether the emails are privileged and, even if they are, has Snyder been sufficiently prejudiced to warrant his requested dismissal.

"Defendant has failed to show that any of the disputed documents reveal defense counsel's thoughts or strategies," according to the brief.

"Defendant filed versions of these exhibits publicly, raising the question whether he has waived any privilege and protection he previously contended they deserve," the prosecution continues.

The brief also contends that Snyder has "repeated his demand that the government answer numerous interrogatories regarding its review process." That, prosecutors say, is a "fishing expedition."

At a hearing in March, a federal judge said he needed more information to decide whether government investigators mishandled email evidence seized from Snyder. At that time, the judge said he did not see a "smoking gun" in Snyder's claims. Since then, both sides have filed briefs supporting their claims.

04112018 - News Article - Judge could probe potential conflicts in corruption case against Portage tow operator



Judge could probe potential conflicts in corruption case against Portage tow operator
Post-Tribune
April 11, 2018
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-cortina-corruption-conflicts-motion-st-0412-story.html

A federal judge may have to decide if any potential conflicts of interest exist that could affect the case against a tow operator indicted alongside Portage Mayor James Snyder.

Defense attorney Kevin Milner and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Koster filed a motion Tuesday asking Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen to set a hearing to decide on whether precautions should be taken since John Cortina, of Kustom Auto Body in Portage, is represented by an attorney who previously worked for witnesses that could testify in the corruption case.

The motion said Milner’s prior representation of potential witnesses could affect Cortina’s right to an attorney free of conflicts, according to court documents, but the defendant could file a waiver with the court.

Milner previously represented several Portage municipal employees and the former owners and employees at Great Lake Peterbilt, according to the motion, and federal prosecutors may call one or more of those people as witnesses during the trial.

“The government has since communicated with Mr. Milner about this issue and Mr. Milner has informed the government that, after reviewing this case completely, he has determined that there is no reason he will need to cross-examine any of his prior clients,” the motion said.

Snyder and Cortina were charged in November 2016 with allegedly violating a federal bribery statue. Federal prosecutors said the mayor allegedly solicited money from Cortina and “Individual A” and gave them a towing contract for Portage.

Snyder received an additional bribery indictment for alleged accepting $13,000 in connection with a Board of Works Contract, and allegedly obstructing Internal Revenue Service laws.

Snyder and Cortina both pleaded not guilty to the charges last year, according to court documents.

The trial for Snyder and Cortina is tentatively set to start in June, according to court documents.

On Monday, Snyder filed a motion to dismiss the charges against him, saying that the case was compromised after prosecutors were able to view privileged communication between the mayor and his defense attorneys.

04112018 - News Article - Hearing on attorney conflict-of-interest requested in Portage public corruption case



Hearing on attorney conflict-of-interest requested in Portage public corruption case
NWI Times
April 11, 2018
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/hearing-on-attorney-conflict-of-interest-requested-in-portage-public/article_4bf87c57-a031-5f04-9adb-37294ba9afda.html

HAMMOND — Both prosecutors and the defense in one of the federal Portage public corruption cases involving Mayor James Snyder are asking for a hearing to determine whether an attorney has a potential conflict of interest.

John Cortina, owner of Kustom Auto Body, 5409 U.S. 6, Portage, was indicted along with Snyder in November 2016, charged with giving Snyder $12,000 in return for being put on the city's list of towing companies.

In a filing late Tuesday in U.S. District Court here, Cortina's attorney, Kevin Milner, of Crown Point, and the U.S. District Attorney's Office have asked that a hearing be set prior to April 20 to determine potential conflict of interest on Milner's part under the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct.

The motion requests a hearing by April 20 so not to delay the start of the trial, scheduled for June 4.

According to the motion, Milner also represented individuals who were questioned by the government and are likely to be witnesses in a different federal charge against Snyder involving his allegedly accepting $13,000 in exchange for awarding contracts for garbage trucks. The filing also states that Milner has worked closely with Snyder's defense team.

The motion raises the concern of violating the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys, as well as affecting Cortina's Sixth Amendment right to an attorney free of potential or actual conflict of interest.

Cortina may waive his right to conflict-free counsel, and Milner's prior clients also may provide written waivers, according to the filing.

However, the two sides are requesting a hearing "out of an abundance of caution," so that Milner's previous clients provide the court with the waivers to be entered into the record. Those clients include Portage Assistant Street Superintendent Randy Reeder; Snyder's administrative assistant Amanda Lakie; former owners of Great Lakes Peterbilt Robert and Steven Buha; and GLP employees Brett Searle and Scott McIntyre, and Cortina. It also would  allow those individuals to testify under oath, according to the document.

04112018 - News Article - Portage mayor seeks dismissal of federal corruption probe - WLFI News



Portage mayor seeks dismissal of federal corruption probe
WLFI News - West Lafayette, IN
April 11, 2018
http://www.wlfi.com/content/news/Portage-mayor-seeks-dismissal-of-federal-corruption-probe-479429253.html


PORTAGE, Ind. (AP) — An indicted northwest Indiana mayor has asked a federal judge to dismiss his corruption case because prosecutors viewed dozens of what should have been confidential attorney-client emails.

Portage Mayor James Snyder filed a motion Monday requesting the dismissal of his three-count indictment from 2016. He pleaded not guilty last year to bribery and tax evasion charges.

The request alleges there are at least 35 emails between Snyder and his defense attorneys that should've been quarantined and not viewed by prosecutors. The motion also alleges Snyder's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when his email accounts were seized.

Snyder had previously asked for the prosecution team's dismissal. A judge hasn't yet ruled on whether new prosecutors should take over the case.

Snyder's trial is set for June 4.

04112018 - News Article - Portage mayor seeks dismissal of federal corruption probe



Portage mayor seeks dismissal of federal corruption probe
Kansas City Star
April 11, 2018
http://www.kansascity.com/news/business/technology/article208566844.html
PORTAGE, IND. - An indicted northwest Indiana mayor has asked a federal judge to dismiss his corruption case because prosecutors viewed dozens of what should have been confidential attorney-client emails.

Portage Mayor James Snyder filed a motion Monday requesting the dismissal of his three-count indictment from 2016. He pleaded not guilty last year to bribery related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, and tax evasion charges related to Snyder's private business.

The request alleges there are at least 35 emails between Snyder and his defense attorneys that should have been quarantined and not viewed by prosecutors. The motion also alleges Snyder's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when his email accounts were seized.

"It is now beyond dispute, the government's trial team has admitted it viewed communications that the taint team had previously deemed confidential," said Jackie Bennett Jr., Snyder's attorney. "Worse, the subject matter of those privileged communication relates directly to core allegations charged in the indictment."

The process used to differentiate between privileged emails was "either a failure by the government to endeavor in good faith to analyze whether certain communications were constitutionally protected, or a negligent or incompetent failure to have done so," the filing said.

Snyder had previously asked for the prosecution team's dismissal. Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen hasn't yet ruled on whether new prosecutors should take over the case.

Van Bokkelen said at a March hearing that the emails looked routine and none appeared to be privileged.

"There's no smoking guns," Van Bokkelen said.

Snyder's trial is set for June 4.

Snyder is a Republican who was elected to his second term as Portage mayor in 2015.

The Democratic former sheriff of neighboring Lake County, John Buncich, was sentenced in January to more than 15 years in prison for a related case of accepting tens of thousands of dollars in bribes from towing businesses.

04102018 - News Article - UPDATE: Portage mayor files motion to dismiss public corruption probe due to handling of emails



UPDATE: Portage mayor files motion to dismiss public corruption probe due to handling of emails
Apr 10, 2018 - Updated 6:45PM
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/update-portage-mayor-files-motion-to-dismiss-public-corruption-probe/article_369bded0-efe7-5927-b5a1-e61c6e9d0f77.html

HAMMOND — In the most recent brief filed in the public corruption case of Portage Mayor James Snyder, Snyder is claiming the violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial is worse than he initially believed.

Snyder, who asked the present prosecution team be dismissed because they had viewed what should have been attorney-client privileged emails, is now asking the court to dismiss his three-count indictment entirely.

According to the motion filed Monday, Snyder knew only that roughly three dozen emails sent between him and his former attorney, Thomas Kirsch II — including several in which they discussed sensitive aspects of their legal defense strategy — came into the possession of the trial team.

According to the motion, more recent court-compelled discovery disclosures have confirmed Snyder’s suspicion that "the government’s left hand had no idea what its right hand was doing."

Snyder, who was indicted in November 2016, is pleading not guilty to bribery charges related to city towing vendor and public works contracts, and tax evasion charges related to his private business. His trial is set for June 4.

The 25-page brief filed in U.S. District Court by Snyder's Indianapolis-based attorney Jackie M. Bennett Jr. alleges four emails that earlier had been determined to be privileged also appeared in a group that were not considered privileged.

"... the government's taint team had designated as privileged certain Snyder emails that inexplicably were then passed, or otherwise made their way, to the government's trial team," and were used as evidence for over two years, according to the brief.

In another example cited by Bennett, other emails, which the defense believed had been determined as privileged, were used during grand jury testimony in an attempt to impeach a witness, one of Snyder's former employees in his private mortgage company.

In addition, the newest brief argues some emails that included other city employees are privileged, despite the prosecution's claim a third party recipient disqualifies the emails for that designation. Bennett argues the city employees included in those emails had played an "integral role" in developing the bidding procedure for the purchase of garbage trucks, which is at the center of one of the indictments.

The brief now contends there are at least 35 emails in question that are client-attorney work product and should have been quarantined and not viewed by the federal prosecution team.

The filing also goes on to allege the entire process the government team used to filter out potentially privileged emails was "either a failure by the government to endeavor in good faith to analyze whether certain communications were constitutionally protected, or a negligent or incompetent failure to have done so."

Bennett also claims Snyder's Fourth Amendment rights were violated in the seizure of his multiple email accounts.

At a hearing in March, a federal judge said he needed more information to decide whether government investigators mishandled email evidence seized from Snyder.

U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen said then he did not see obvious indications the government took an impermissible look into Snyder's defense strategies. Prosecutors filed their briefs on the matter March 26 with Snyder's response being filed Monday.

04102018 - News Article - Portage mayor asks judge to dismiss federal corruption charges



Portage mayor asks judge to dismiss federal corruption charges
Post-Tribune
April 10, 2018
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-snyder-corruption-motion-dismissal-st-0411-story.html

Indicted Portage Mayor James Snyder has asked a federal judge to dismiss his corruption case, according to court documents.

Snyder’s attorney, Jackie Bennett Jr., filed a motion Monday to dismiss the charges saying that federal prosecutors had access to privileged communications between the mayor and his defense attorneys despite a screening process by investigators that reportedly weeded out those emails, according to court documents.

“More recent court-compelled discovery productions have only confirmed Snyder’s suspicion that ‘the government’s left hand had no idea what its right hand was doing,’” Bennett said in the motion. “Most notably, communications that were deemed by the government’s taint team to be privileged – and thereafter supposedly ‘quarantined’ from the trial team – are among the documents it now admits it has freely accessed and used for two years.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office does not comment on pending cases.

During the discovery process for Snyder’s trial, Bennett said it was found that documents reviewed by the prosecutors contained confidential attorney-client material, according to court documents. Bennett said federal investigators used a “taint team” to review the email communication seized, according to court documents, but that review failed to shield all privileged communications from the trial team.

Bennett said when the defense received the emails quarantined by federal investigators for being privileged, several of those were also found in possession of the trial team.

“It is now beyond dispute, the government’s trial team has admitted it viewed communications that the taint team had previously deemed confidential,” Bennett wrote. “Worse, the subject matter of those privileged communication relates directly to core allegations charged in the indictment.”

The motion to dismiss centers on issues related to emails screened by the federal trial team that contained privileged information, but Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen has not yet ruled on whether new prosecutors should handle the case.

The emails looked routine, Van Bokkelen said during a March hearing, and none of the documents that went through the screening appeared privileged.

“There’s no smoking guns,” Van Bokkelen said.

The allegations against the prosecutors say email communications between Snyder, defense attorney Thomas Dogan, and Thomas Kirsch II, who was then the mayor’s defense attorney before being appointed as U.S. attorney, were seized in 2015, according to court documents.

Kirsch has recused himself from Snyder’s case, according to court documents, and U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois would oversee and manage local prosecutors handling the case.

Snyder and John Cortina, of Kustom Auto Body in Portage, were charged in November 2016 with allegedly violating a federal bribery statue. Federal prosecutors said the mayor allegedly solicited money from Cortina and “Individual A” and gave them a towing contract for Portage.

Snyder received an additional bribery indictment for allegedly accepting $13,000 in connection with a Board of Works contract, and allegedly obstructing Internal Revenue Service laws.

Snyder and Cortina both pleaded not guilty to the charges last year, according to court documents.

The trial for Snyder and Cortina is tentatively set to start in June, according to court documents.

08132023 - News Article - Former Portage Mayor James Snyder asks US Supreme Court to consider his case

  Former Portage Mayor James Snyder asks US Supreme Court to consider his case Chicago Tribune  Aug 13, 2023 https://www.chicagotribune.com/...